The problem it solves
- Inconsistent intended-purpose wording
- Weak classification rationale
- Claims unsupported by evidence
- Incomplete traceability
- Risk management disconnected from validation or evidence
- Inconsistent software documentation
- Unclear clinical or performance conclusions
- Missing regulatory justifications
- Contradictory documents
- Unanswered regulatory questions
Required inputs
- Technical documentation index
- Core technical documentation
- QMS information
- Risk-management documentation
- Clinical or performance documentation
- Verification and validation
- Software documentation where applicable
- PMS and vigilance documentation
- Existing Notified Body questions, if relevant
What Fabola does
We perform a structured readiness review and identify issues likely to interfere with efficient conformity assessment. Where useful, the review can be conducted as a mock Notified Body assessment with likely assessor questions formulated explicitly.
Deliverables
- Notified Body readiness report
- Priority findings
- Document-specific observations
- Likely assessor questions
- Evidence gaps
- Recommended corrective actions
- Submission-readiness checklist
Price
Focused pre-submission review
SEK 59,000
Review of a defined subset of documentation or one critical area before submission.
Single-device readiness review
SEK 79,000–99,000
Typical review of one device submission with cross-document consistency assessment and likely assessor questions.
Full technical documentation review
SEK 119,000–139,000
Detailed pre-submission review of a mature and extensive MDR or IVDR technical documentation package.
All prices are in SEK and exclude VAT.
Delivery time
Typical delivery: 2–4 weeks.
Completion point
The assignment ends when the agreed documentation has been reviewed and the manufacturer has a prioritised list of actions required before submission.
Exclusions
- Guaranteeing certification
- Predicting the decision of a specific Notified Body
- Acting on behalf of the Notified Body
- Rewriting all documents unless separately scoped
- Executing missing validation or clinical studies
If further work is needed
Depending on the outcome, no further Fabola work may be required. You resolve the identified gaps and proceed to Notified Body submission. Where targeted support during assessment is needed, it is scoped separately.
Frequently asked questions
Can you guarantee that the Notified Body will not raise questions?
No. Notified Body assessors make their own conformity-assessment decisions. The purpose of the review is to identify avoidable gaps, inconsistencies and weak regulatory arguments before submission.
Can you review only one part of the technical file?
Yes. A focused review can cover a defined area such as clinical evidence, software documentation, risk management or a response package to existing Notified Body questions.
Can you perform a mock Notified Body review?
Yes. Where appropriate, Fabola can structure the review around the questions an external assessor is likely to ask and provide a prioritised response plan.
Should we do this before signing with a Notified Body?
It can be useful either before or after selecting a Notified Body, provided the planned conformity assessment route and product scope are sufficiently clear.
Primary regulatory sources
Last reviewed: September 2026
- Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/745/oj
- Regulation (EU) 2017/746 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/746/oj
Related services
MDR and IVDR readiness
How far are we from being ready for CE marking under the MDR or IVDR?
Clinical and performance evidence
What evidence do we actually need to support our medical device or IVD?
AI validation and evidence
How do we demonstrate that our AI-enabled medical device works reliably and safely for its intended medical use?
Ready to define the work?
Tell us what the product is, where the project stands and the regulatory question you need answered.
We will confirm whether this service fits, or point you to a better starting point.
The first conversation is free and carries no commitment.